My Personal Blog - SeanandRuth.us

You can find my personal blog covering non-political topics at http://seanandruth.us

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Senate Chairman Conrad’s Budget Proposal: More Taxes Than President’s Budget, No Spending Cuts, No Structural Reform

First - the Twitter version:

Unanimous Republican participation at our Budget Committee 'mark-up'. Not as much on the Democrat side...

---Here's the email version:

NOTE: The Budget Committee had been scheduled to hold an official mark-up today, but that was cancelled yesterday. Senators will now only be allowed to give opening statements; no amendments will be offered and no votes will be cast.

 

April 18, 2012

For Immediate Release

Contact:  Stephen Miller,

               Andrew Logan: 202.228.0575

 

Chairman Conrad's Budget Proposal: More Taxes Than President's Budget, No Spending Cuts, No Structural Reform

 

All of the deficit reduction in Senator Conrad's budget comes from tax increases. The proposal will increase taxes by $2.6 trillion and provides no net change in spending relative to the current policy baseline after enactment of the Budget Control Act. Taxes in 2022 would be double the level that would be realized under a revenue baseline that accounts for the extension of current tax policies. Over the 10-year period, the tax increases in the Chairman's proposal exceed those proposed by the President by $600 billion.

 

The Chairman misses the opportunity to reduce spending. Over the 10 years covered by his proposal, net spending is unchanged. Any spending reductions, such as claimed savings from health care, are used to pay for spending increases elsewhere. While this is better than the budget proposed by the President—who calls for spending increases of $1.4 trillion relative to the baseline—it is far worse than the budget passed by the House, which cuts spending by $3.9 trillion over 10 years. Spending will grow twice as fast as the rate of inflation. Spending in 2022 will be 49 percent higher than in 2012, while inflation over that period is expected to be only 22 percent.

 

Relative to the Fiscal Commission plan rejected by the House on a 38–382 vote, Chairman Conrad's proposal spends $700 billion more and increases taxes by an additional $900 billion.

 

Chairman Conrad's Budget Plan

(2013–2022 total, in trillions)

Chairman's Mark

Change from Current Policy

% Change 2012–2022

Taxes

$39.6

+$2.6

106%

Spending

$44.0

$0.0

49%

Gross Debt, End of 2022

$22.9

-$2.6

43%

Interest Expense

$4.5

-$0.3

196%

 

Gross federal debt under the Chairman's budget will reach almost $23 trillion at the end of 2022. That is an increase of $8.2 trillion from the level at the close of the last fiscal year. Debt in 2022 will be 43 percent higher than the end of this fiscal year.

 

The increase in debt drives large increases in the government's net interest expense. Interest costs in 2022 of $662 billion will be three times what they are today—and will more than exceed the base cost of the national defense in that year. In fact, interest costs will exceed the cost of defense in 2020, and remain there throughout the projection period.

 

Chairman Conrad's Budget Plan

(2013–2022 total, in trillions)

Chairman's Mark

Change from Current Policy

% Change 2012–2022

Medicare (Function 570)

$6.6

$0.0

74%

Other Health (Function 550)

$6.3

-$0.1

131%

Education (Function 500)

$1.0

$0.0

28%

 

While the Chairman's proposal vitiates the Budget Control Act fallback sequester mechanism, it retains the defense cuts ($300 billion) in the sequester (which are in addition to defense cuts in the BCA caps). Defense spending in 2022 would be 9 percent higher than 2012, or about 13 percent less than would be needed to keep pace with inflation.

 

Mandatory spending grows at three times the rate of inflation under the Chairman's proposal. Net Medicare spending is virtually unchanged (-$31 billion) relative to current law. The Medicare physician pay freeze assumed in the proposal is offset by other changes in the program. Other health spending shows a slight decrease, but is largely unchanged. In particular, the health insurance subsidies and Medicaid expansions of the president's health law are preserved, resulting in spending for the health function that more than doubles between 2012 and 2022. While those unfunded obligations are set in place, there is no structural reform to prevent existing entitlements from insolvency.

 

Education spending is largely unchanged. The Chairman proposes to eliminate subsidized student loans for undergraduates, which provides $45 billion in savings over 10 years. Education spending will continue to grow faster than the rate of inflation.

 

To view this analysis as a PDF, please click here.

 

 


Eagle Forum discussion on Property Rights; Extra Links and Topics Discussed

To follow up from discussion last night at the Eagle Forum Education Center:

We can do something about private property rights being diminished. The major way is to be prepared to help gather signatures for a future initiative petition drive led by Ron Calzone. Here is a link to his speech explaining the specifics in Missouri regarding our Constitution and property rights.

How does the Missouri Constitution protect you? Know your Missouri Bill of Rights!

Here are two links regarding Rombach Farms Pumpkin Patch and possible property rights abuse:
1. Here's the FOX article about the drainage ditch in Rombach Farms Pumpkin Patch
http://fox2now.com/2012/04/16/chesterfield-outlet-mall-plan-could-wipe-out-popular-farm/

2. discusses raising taxes to finance the outlets and competition with Chesterfield Mall
http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/print-edition/2012/04/06/outlet-malls-battle-for-priority-in.html?page=all

NOTE: I can't find the "Save the Rombach Pumpkin Patch" Facebook page. I'm wondering if the FOX story pushed the developers to find somewhere else to put in the ditch?

We lightened it up last night: Cartoon illustration with featuring Reagan and Obama that we all enjoyed last night: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3h8O7V-WxWQ

OTHER ODDS AND ENDS:

Eminent Domain Event on April 23, 2012 from 7:30 pm to 9:30pm at the Luminary Center for the Arts hosted by the Show Me Institute.

Please join us for a free advance screening of the Battle for Brooklyn, a documentary about the abuse of eminent domain to make way for luxury housing and a stadium.

Afterwards, we will host a panel discussion about the threat of eminent domain in the Saint Louis area. Homer Tourkakis, owner of Eminent Dental, will discuss his four-year long battle for his business with the City of Arnold.

--------------

Project Appleseed is an activity of The Revolutionary War Veterans Association, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, dedicated to teaching every American our shared heritage and history as well as traditional rifle marksmanship skills.

Next weekend in Missouri:
Osage Beach, MO - Oct 21-28

--------------

What is the role of government? Kimberly-Clark paper mill shuts down in Washington state.
"The federal government announced last week that it approved $1.79 million in emergency assistance for 570 Kimberly-Clark workers in Everett to help them find new jobs. At this point, it's unclear exactly how the money will be used, but local officials said the money will be put to good use."

http://www.king5.com




Thursday, March 22, 2012

St. Louis Northside rising against political corruption - EVENT

NORTHSIDE RISING: ANTI-POLITICAL CORRUPTION,... ABUSE OF POWERS & RETALIATION PRESS CONFERENCE & RALLY
By Romona Taylor Williams

Thursday March 22, 2012, 5:00pm @ Alderman Antonio French's 21st ward office 4200 Natural Bridge, St. Louis MO.
NORTHSIDE RISING: “COURAGE TO DISSENT”
Rally & Press Conference Against Northside Political Corruption, Abuse of Powers & Retaliation

PREAMBLE: WE THE PEOPLE stand united to call for an end to POLITICAL CORRUPTION, ABUSE OF POWERS AND RETALIATION in the City of St. Louis... and in particular the NORTHSIDE!!!

WHY: In 5 short years Northside residents have been humiliated by
5 elected officials’ convictions of criminal and ethics violations.
Northside residents expect and deserve a higher code of ethics from our elected officials.

WHO:

Alderman Antonio FRENCH, 21st Ward, was recently found guilty of campaign finance violations by the MO Ethics Commission and fined over $38,000. This is the most recent of other occurences.

State Senators EL-AMIN and Jeff SMITH were charged and convicted of bribery and obstructing justice.

State Senator Robin WRIGHT-JONES was charged and fined over $190,000 by the Missouri Ethics Commissions for campaign finance violations.

State Representative Rodney HUBBARD was charged and fined over
$300,000 by the MO Ethics Commission for campaign finance violations.

Rally & Press Conference: Thursday March 22, 2012, 5:00 p.m.
Alderman Antonio French 21st Ward Office
4200 Natural Bridge, St. Louis, MO

!!!MEDIA INVITED!!!

Monday, March 19, 2012

You're Invited: Book Discussion on Phyllis Schlafly's Supremacists on Tuesday Nights in Clayton

RSVP by posting a comment.
 
START Book discussion on Phyllis Schlafly's "The Supremacists"

March. 27 - 7:00 p.m. (Tuesday) - Topical Study - The Tyranny of Judges and How to Stop it
Where: Eagle Forum Education Center, 7800 Bonhomme Ave. (Clayton, MO)
You can download the chapters and questions by clicking on the chapter title:

   * Judges Rewrite the Constitution
   * Religion

April 3 - 7:00 p.m. (Tuesday) - Topical Study - The Tyranny of Judges and How to Stop it
Where: Eagle Forum Education Center, 7800 Bonhomme Ave. (Clayton, MO)

   * Marriage
   * Sovereignty and Foreign Law

April 10 - 7:00 p.m. (Tuesday) - Topical Study - The Tyranny of Judges and How to Stop it
Where: Eagle Forum Education Center, 7800 Bonhomme Ave. (Clayton, MO)


   * Property Rights
   * Property Rights Battle in MIssouri

April 17  - 7:00 p.m. (Tuesday) - Topical Study - The Tyranny of Judges and How to Stop it
Where: Eagle Forum Education Center, 7800 Bonhomme Ave. (Clayton, MO)

   * Pornography
   * Life & Feminism
   * Law Enforcement

April 24  - 7:00 p.m. (Tuesday) - Topical Study - The Tyranny of Judges and How to Stop it
Where: Eagle Forum Education Center, 7800 Bonhomme Ave. (Clayton, MO)

   * Immigration
   * Elections
   * Parents' Rights

May 1  - 7:00 p.m. (Tuesday) - Topical Study - The Tyranny of Judges and How to Stop it
Where: Eagle Forum Education Center, 7800 Bonhomme Ave. (Clayton, MO)


   * Taxes
   * How Supremacy Began & How It Grew
   *
May 8 - 7:00 p.m. (Tuesday) - Topical Study - The Tyranny of Judges and How to Stop it
Where: Eagle Forum Education Center, 7800 Bonhomme Ave. (Clayton, MO)


   * How to Stop Judicial Supremacy
   * Wrap up

May 15

---Make up for anything we've missed -- Maybe do a dinner?

Thursday, March 08, 2012

Palestinian woman can't advance because of Israel? What about the men?

The [U.N.] resolution calls Israel's occupation of disputed territory "the major obstacle for Palestinian women with regard to their advancement, self-reliance and integration in the development of their society."
Read more on Newsmax.com: UN Panel Slams Israel, Ignores Syria; Obama Gives Wind Firms $2.6 Billion

Now really? No one at the U.N. can see the ongoing conflict in Syria, with hundreds of women dead, as something worth passing a resolution against?


Even more, women and men are made in God's image, and all the violence around the world horrific. It's too bad that so much taxpayer money goes for passing worthless feel-good-for-the-feminists resolutions interlaced with internationalist-special-interest agendas.   





Tuesday, March 06, 2012

Study Shows Head Start Preschool Programs Don't Measure Up--to what?

My question is: to what do Head Start Preschool Programs not measure up to? Is it really possible that these kids are less prepared after these programs? I think that should cause us to really start re-thinking how our little ones need more than programing to reach their unique potential throughout their lives.
"In January 2010, after four years of “analysis,” the HHS Department finally released the results on Head Start’s impact on first graders. The study found that, compared to their control group peers, Head Start failed to boost students’ cognitive abilities across 41 measures. Moreover, first grade teachers reported that former Head Start students were actually less prepared in math than the non-Head Start students."

http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/03/05/parents-deserve-to-know-the-facts-about-head-start/

Monday, March 05, 2012

State Senate Lines - calls and email needed

I've gotten a few emails on this, and with your help, it's possible to put pressure on this committee by Urging them to vote "no" and to go back and adopt the second Judicial Commission map that was constitutional, fairer and only thrown out on a technicality.


Here's the back story: 


Many of you already are aware of the confusion of the re-districting process since the first maps were vetoed by the governor and then sent to the state supreme court.  Most maps have now been resolved except for the state Senatorial boundaries which I am contacting you about.  A new commission (of 4 Dems. & 4 Repubs) was appointed by the governor.  That commission drew yet another map that moved Sen. Cunningham's 7th district to the Kansas City area where she could not move to and is a majority Democrat Party locale. The four Republican members of the Commission caved like marshmallows to the four Democrat members and gave them whatever they wanted in other areas as well.  Was this an act of vengeance within their own party for the St.Louis area China hub, or resistance to Obamacare from Prop. C sponsored by Sen.Cunningham?  Or was it just poor leadership?

Whatever the motivation, please contact these commission members and let them know that they can do better and say no their map and yes to the previous judicial map.

Jean Paul Bradshaw II    jpbradshaw@lathropage.com
Steve Ehlmann                 sehlmann@att.blackberry.net
Marc Ellinger                     mellinger@blitzbardgett.com
Nick Myers                         myerscpa@swbell.net
Lowell Pearson                 lowell.pearson@huschblackwell.com
Lloyd Smith                       lloyd@mogop.org

--------------

The senate redistricting commission recently drew a map that many believe is unconstitutional for reasons listed below.  It also totally eliminates a district for Senator Jane Cunningham to run in.  Not only is the Republican Party hurt by the map, but conservatives are especially targeted. 

Seven concerned plaintiffs around the state have filed a federal lawsuit to challenge the constitutionality of the egregious map.  Many have been asking what they can do.

The only avenue for you 
to stop the damage is to send an email no later than 4:30pm on Friday, March 9th to the bipartisan Senate Apportionment Commission at matt.hesser@oa.mo.gov.  Below are some problems with the map that you may want to pick and choose to include in your comments as well as your own thoughts.  It is important to comment in your own words even if you use the ideas below.  It is also important to comment because the more comments there are the better chance there is of either convincing the commissioners to drop the unconstitutional map or for the federal lawsuit to win.  We don't want to get to court and the Commissioners say no one cared enough to comment.

The commissioners have a final vote on this bad map after the public comment deadline of May 9th.  Urge them to vote "no" and to go back and adopt the second Judicial Commission map that was constitutional, fairer and only thrown out on a technicality.  This is what everyone expected in both parties.  Everyone was shocked.

**The map is unconstitutional because it advantages urban regions over rural regions in the state.  Since the map contains much lower populations in the urban districts, it produces more senators from the urban areas.  This regional advantage is discriminatory and not permissible under the U.S. Constitution. 

**Since the rural senate districts are more populated on the redrawn map, that means there are more constituents for a senator to service and therefore less attention to his/her constituents.

**The populations are moving out of the urban areas to the suburban and rural areas, so to overpopulate those rural districts will only exacerbate the population differences in a short number of years.  The map redrawing happens once every ten years after the census and seeks to make all the districts as equally populated as possible. 

**The senate map the judicial commission drew is fair in this regard and has only a deviation of 7.79% between the highest and lowest populated districts while the Democrat and Republican Commission has a larger deviation of 9.6%.  The judges did a far better job than the Ds and Rs. 

**Senate District 7 (Cunningham-Republican, Chesterfield) in St. Louis County which is up for election this year was arbitrarily moved across the state to a very urban, Democrat district in Kansas City that previously had an even number and was therefore not up for election.  This appears purposeful to increase the Democrat vote in a very liberal area for the upcoming critical national and state elections not to mention provide an extra Democrat senator for the next two legislative sessions. 

**That urban Kansas City Senator's District (#10-Jolie Justice) was flip flopped the opposite direction to a very rural area in the central eastern part of the state.  These constituents of the new 10th will have no say in whom their senator is for two more legislative sessions and Sen. Justice will certainly not move to that area. 
 
YOU SHOULD ALSO CALL OR EMAIL YOUR CONCERNS TO THE REPUBLICAN MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION LISTED BELOW.  IN ADDITION TO THE POINTS ABOVE, YOU MAY WANT TO POINT OUT MORE SPECIFIC PARTY INTERESTS.
**The population numbers in St. Louis City and County were changed enough to yield only one Republican Senator from the area in the near future rather than the present four.  Without having vigorous Republican senate campaigns in St. Louis County, the needed 150,000 votes needed to win statewide elections for Republicans is lost.  This map is clearly a Democrat's and a liberal's dream map and unfortunately the Republicans on the Commission gave away the store. 

**St. Louis, the economic engine of the state loses it's influence in the senate with this most recent map.  Not only did St. Louis City and County lose an entire senate district when they lost less than 1/4 of a senate district in population, they increased the likelihood of the representation soon being six Democrats to one Republican senator rather than the present four and four.  Because the Republicans are in the majority and therefore set the agenda and direction of the legislature, St. Louis has even less influence having to depend on the minority party to represent them.  The population decrease of 40,000 (less than 1/4 of a senate seat) did not necessitate the loss of a senate district.  All the Republican and Democrat senators in the St. Louis region submitted a map they had agreed to.  It was not even considered by this second bipartisan commission. 

**The clear advantage given away to the Democrats for the national and statewide campaigns (Obama, McCaskill, Nixon) by transferring District 7 into downtown Kansas City to energize that liberal population not only for the Democrat primary but the general election.  It is hard to imagine Republicans would vote to so benefit the Democrats in such a critical election year.  

The Republican Commissioners are:Jean Paul Bradshaw II jpbradshaw@lathropgage.com 816-460-5507.  Lathrop & Gage in KC

Steve Ehlmann sehlmann@att.blackberry.net 636-949-7520.  The only Republican "no" vote but that needs to be shored up so he doesn't flip to a yes.
 
Marc Ellinger mellinger@blitzbardgett.com 573-230-1192, Vice Chair of the Commission and head of Republican delegation.  No one knows why GOP Chair Lloyd Smith put him on a list from which the Governor chose since Ellinger testified for the plaintiffs against the Republican Congressional maps.

Nick Myers myerscpa@swbell.net 417-623-2214, SW part of state.

Lowell Pearson lowell.pearson@huschblackwell.com 573-761-1115,

Lloyd Smith lloyd@mogop.org573-636-3146, Executive Director, MO Republican Party.  This is where the buck stops since he is well payed to lead the Republican Party in our state.  If any of the commissioners did not understand the repercussions of their decision, it is Lloyd's job to strongly inform them or not put their name on a list of potential commissioners to begin with.  

Thursday, February 23, 2012

Thank you Rep. Ryan Silvey, Rep. Mark Parkinson, Rep. Jeff Grisamore, Rep. Chris Kelly for standing up against Obamacare Exchanges

From Missouri First - Feb. 22:

After grilling representatives from the Department of Social Services and receiving pitiful responses, Rep. Ryan Silvey declaired that the $50 M federal grant that clearly could be used to set up an Obamacare Exchange WILL NOT be in the Budget he takes to the full House.

Silvey had some good help from Reps. Mark Parkinson, Jeff Grisamore, and Chris Kelly, who asked what strings were attached to the grant, how the money would be spent, and why out of state contractors seemed to get the computer system development jobs when we had some of the best talent available right here in Missouri. No answers from the bureaucrats.

Neither the folks from DSS nor the author of the amendment, Rep. Tom Flanigan, could even tell the committee the name of the federal grant they were promoting. Silvey asked if it was, perhaps, the "Affordable Care State Planning and Establishment Grant". The answer from DSS: Ummm... I don't think so, well... maybe it could be... Silvey said he was pretty sure that was the name.

Since DSS couldn't answer the tough questions, Silvey tried to find some state agency who would admit to being the originator of the request to add the $50 M budget item and called for them, one agency at a time, from the crowded hearing room -- there were no takers.

It seems that supporting Obamacare Exchanges is out of vogue!

Silvey's final edict is that he will not even consider adding the grant money to the budget until the governor specifically makes a request for it.

I think the governor's too smart to do that, considering 71% of the voters rejected Obamacare.

What's more, after talking to them, I'm confident that key senators would kill anything that smells of Obamacare, so savvy members of the House won't want to take a political beating supporting a dead cause.

We've cut another head off the Hydra, but don't think for a minute it won't attack again. We need to remain vigilant!

To the 405 of you who sent witness forms and made phone calls with only hours of notice -- THANK YOU!

Together, we're making a difference!

Specal thanks are due to:





For liberty,

Ron Calzone, director
Missouri First, Inc.

Monday, February 20, 2012

Missouri House Ignoring Constitution: Supreme Court Decision is a Wake Up Call

---from Missouri First:

At least twice in the last three weeks red flags have been raised about the lack of respect the Missouri General Assembly has for the Constitution.

First the chairman of an influential committee – the committee responsible for beginning the process of doling out many millions of public dollars to private parties – publicly declared that her committee has no responsibility to evaluate the constitutionality of legislation it considers.

Then, this last week, the Missouri Supreme Court chastised the House and the Senate for their neglect of constitutional responsibilities. Let's take a look at what the Court had to say before we go back to the committee chairman.

SUPREME COURT RULES AGAINST GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Klebba v. Missouri was a challenge to the the 2010 “Ominbus Ethics Reform Bill” (SB 844). Here's the history of that bill:

SB 844 came from the Senate as a one page bill “relating to contracts for purchasing, printing, and services for statewide elected officials”. It was originally a consent bill.
The House General Laws Committee passed it on to the Rules Committee as one page.
When the main ethics bill fell apart and House leadership needed another “vehicle” for the ethics language, the Rules Committee sent SB 844 back to General Laws. (04/28/2012)
Then all in one day, the General Laws Committee amended it with 65 pages, it was sent back to Rules and then on to the whole House. About an hour later, with Rep. Tim Jones handling the bill, the whole body was expected to take it up and vote for its passage. With no time to really determine what was in the bill, they did just that in a party-line vote. (05/06/2012)
Citizen activists complained that the bill contained unconstitutional provisions and that it was unconstitutional in form. Among the unconstitutional provisions was one that would have made class D felons out of anyone who “Attempts to influence any elected official other than an elected official who represents the legislative district where the person resides” if they didn't register as a lobbyist and file the required reports.
In a conference committee including members of the House and Senate, at the insistence of citizen activists, the most offensive language was removed, but the bill was still unconstitutional in form.
Now, 21 months later, the Missouri Supreme Court unanimously ruled that SB 844 was, indeed, unconstitutional because of its multiple subject omnibus form, the fact that it departed from its original purpose, and because it violated free speech as guaranteed by the First Amendment.

COURT'S MESSAGE TO LEGISLATORS
The Klebba decision should be a clear message to the men and women the People send to Jefferson City to represent them: Start respecting the Constitution!

In his concurring opinion, Judge Zel Fischer made that abundantly clear as he pointed out the many recent cases involving the “original purpose” and “single subject” requirements of the Constitution. He wrote, “[the number of cases] continue[s] to rise annually... because the legislature frequently ignores these clearly expressed constitutional provisions.” (Emp. added)

He concluded his opinion with an admonition to the Court which also impugned the General assembly. “...because [the court] has encouraged a lack of legislative accountability and transparency and has permitted the legislature to thwart the will of the people by openly violating clear and express procedural provisions of the Missouri Constitution.” (Emp. Added)

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE CHAIR IGNORES CONSTITUTION
It's disconcerting to think that our legislators are “openly violating” the Constitution as they pass laws that affect the lives of our families, but now some of them are no longer even pretending to be constrained by that document.

At the January 31st public hearing for the Freight Forwarder's bill (HB 1476, part of the China Hub bill), four citizen activists testified against the measure. Among other things, these citizens called to question the constitutionality of the targeted subsidies in the bill.

During his 5 minutes of testimony, Ron Calzone was repeatedly interrupted by Chairman Anne Zerr and told that his comments were not germane and that her committee had no responsibility to consider the constitutionality of bills before it. She implied that it was their job to enact legislation and let the courts sort out the constitutionality.

PASSING THE BUCK
That's a scary proposition for more than one reason! First, if legislators don't have to worry about the constitutionality of legislation, what does their oath to “support the Constitution of the United States and of the state of Missouri” actually mean?

Chairman Zerr's comments were doubly disconcerting when you consider the great deference the courts usually give to the legislative process. Here's a typical statement of the standard of review from the Missouri Supreme Court when statutes are challenged: “This Court's review must begin with the recognition that laws enacted by the legislature and approved by the governor have a strong presumption of constitutionality.” (Emp. added) JACKSON CTY. SPORTS COMPLEX AUTH. v. State, 226 SW 3d 156 - Mo: Supreme Court 2007

In simpler terms, what we have is legislators, like Rep. Anne Zerr, saying, “The courts will do it.” and the courts saying, “The legislature already did it.”, and then there's often no one actually making sure the Constitution is upheld and the People's rights are defended.

THE PATRIOT'S RESPONSE – CALL TO ACTION
The People of Missouri can't let this great shirking of legislative responsibility go unchallenged. We must demand that our representatives uphold the Constitution first and foremost.

Rep. Zerr has been asked to issue a memo to her committee retracting her statements from the January 31st hearing and instruting them to, indeed, consider the constitutionality of bills, but she has declined.

The issue has been brought to the attention of Speaker Steve Tilley's office, and his staff has refused a request for him to clarify the responsibility his committee chairman have to consider the constitutionality of bills. The Speaker's spokesman replied that the Speaker doesn't like to micro-manage the committees. So much for leadership.

CALL TO ACTION: Citizens from across the state should call, write, email and fax Rep. Anne Zerr and Speaker Steve Tilley and demand that they establish clear policy that supports the Constitution, as their oath of office requires. Memos should be sent to all committee chairs.

Letters to editors, blog posts and calls to radio shows are also in order. If our representatives can continue to ignore the Constitution, the People are left with little recourse.

Rep. Anne Zerr
Phone: (573) 751-3717
Email: Anne.Zerr@house.mo.gov
MO House of Representatives
201 West Capitol Avenue
Room 300
Jefferson City MO 65101

Speaker Steve Tilley
Phone: (573) 751-1488
Email: Steven.Tilley@house.mo.gov
MO House of Representatives
201 West Capitol Avenue
Room 308A
Jefferson City MO 65101

Friday, February 17, 2012

Local S. Baptist College, Hannibal-LaGrange University, opposes to the Obama Administration’s mandate that health insurance plans cover contraceptives

February 12, 2012

NEWS RELEASE

Reference: Dr. Terry M. Buster, Chairman, HLGU Board of Trustees

Official Position of the HLGU Board of Trustees

Hannibal, MO – Hannibal-LaGrange University participates in the group medical plan

of GuideStone Financial Resources. The plan is available to all eligible employees of HLGU

and their dependents. It is not available to students of Hannibal-LaGrange.

GuideStone’s group medical plan does not cover abortion, abortifacients, or emergency

contraceptives, procedures, services or medication that would yield similar results.

The health care reform mandated by the Obama administration contains contraception

coverage as part of those requirements. GuideStone’s group medical plan, as is the case with

most plans in the nation, could eventually be subject those contraceptive coverage requirements

unless appropriate religious accommodations are granted. GuideStone does not and will not

provide abortive contraceptives.

Hannibal-LaGrange University is in total opposition to the Obama Administration’s

mandate that health insurance plans cover contraceptives, including ones that can cause

abortions. We believe that this decision to require schools like Hannibal-LaGrange University to

provide to its employees medical coverage which covers abortion-inducing contraceptives is an

affront to our religious liberties. We strongly oppose any Governmental edict that infringes on

fundamentals of our beliefs.

At Hannibal-LaGrange University we firmly believe that God holds human life to be

sacred. We strongly object to legislation that mandates providing abortion coverage (Plan B,

Ella, morning after pill, or RU-486) to our employees and their dependents.

We join our health care provider, GuideStone, in their effort to have this mandate

removed from our health plan.

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Stop Ultra Liberal Judicial Nominee Jesse Furman!

Stop Ultra Liberal Judicial Nominee Jesse Furman!

This Friday, the Senate will vote on a Cloture motion to end discussion and move to final confirmation of Jesse M. Furman, whom President Obama has nominated to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Furman is considered one of Obama’s most radical and controversial nominees. We need you to call your Senators and tell them to vote NO on Cloture on Jesse Furman’s confirmation for the following reasons:

Furman has actively advocated against religious freedom.

In 2001, Furman joined in filing an amicus brief in the landmark Supreme Court case of Good News Club v. Milford Central School, seeking to ban a Christian organization from using public school property, outside of school hours, even when the use was clearly not a school sponsored event. The Supreme Court soundly rejected Furman’s invitation to legislate from the bench.

Furman singled out Christians and declared that First Amendment free speech rights do not extend to Christians because they do not “promote cohesion among a heterogeneous democratic people.”

In his amicus brief in the Good News Club case, Furman argued:

“In short, while the public school is ‘[d]esigned to serve as perhaps the most powerful agency for promoting cohesion among a heterogeneous democratic people,’ the Good News Club is designed to do quite the opposite: to label children as either ‘saved’ or ‘unsaved’ and, thus, to promote religious belief in general and Christian belief in particular. Indeed, the Good News Club expressly teaches that adherence to a particular faith is essential to one's standing in the community — that those who 'have received the Lord Jesus as [their] Savior from sin … belong to God's special group — His family.' "

Furman characterized all of traditional Christianity as intolerant, and arrogantly declared that a “categorical exclusion of that [Christian] speech as both a reasonable, viewpoint-neutral limitation, consistent with the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment, and as a limitation mandated by the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.”

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Cool Teachers' Resource - Classroom Videos on entrepreneurship, property rights, free trade, global warming, and personal responsibility

I found out about "izzit.org" reading a Heritage Foundation publication; it's for teachers of 4th - 12th grade students.
Ultimately, Chitester and Mead want to help teachers get their students to think for themselves about the role of government in their lives; they want the kids to always ask themselves: Who’s choosing? 
izzit.org provides teachers with high-quality educational videos and accompanying lesson plans on range of topics. These include entrepreneurship, property rights, free trade, global warming, and personal responsibility.   
Read an entire interview with the creators of izzit.org here.

Monday, November 21, 2011

Two Billboards on I-44 Highlight Troop Donations to Ron Paul

Correction: This billboard design was created at Ron Paul Forums. The funding of this billboard was COMPLETELY driven by the designers of the billboard, on the forum.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Lloyd Sloan
lloyd_sloan@yahoo.com

Two Billboards on I-44 Highlight Troops Support for Ron Paul

Two bill boards--believed to be the first billboards of the presidential cycle here in Missouri--were installed along I-44 by Ron DeClue, the owner of Alpha Display Inc, a Missouri sign company. The signs promote Ron Paul, who during the last quarter, received more in campaign donations from Missourians than each of the other Republican candidates. These signs were not paid for by Paul's official campaign, however. A group of local supporters worked in conjunction with the American Liberty Coalition out of Wisconsin to design, place and fund the billboards.  This billboard design was created at Ron Paul Forums. The funding of this billboard was COMPLETELY driven by the designers of the billboard, on the forum.


One sign which is viewed by westbound drivers leaving Sullivan, MO reads “Our Troops Support Paul.” The sign uses a bargraph to show that Ron Paul is apparently the US Military’s choice for president. He receives more in donations from active troops than Obama and more than all of the other GOP candidates put together. In fact, www.supportthemnow.com, the website featured on the sign, links to OpenSecrets.org to show that the US Army, the US Air Force and the US Navy were the top three contributors to Ron Paul’s campaign during the 3rd quarter of 2011.

The other billboard, viewed by eastbound drivers just passing Leasburg, features the official campaign website: www.ronpaul2012.com where Ron Paul's "Restore America Plan" is outlined. This plan would balance the US federal budget by 2015, during the first three years of Paul's presidency, by cutting five federal departments and $1 trillion of spending--mostly US spending abroad. The plan would not cut Social Security or Medicare.

A recent Bloomberg poll shows Ron Paul statistically tied for first place in Iowa. Ron Paul won the NFRA straw poll a few weeks ago in the first-to-vote state of Iowa.

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Hear from the pharmacist who took on Gov. Rod Blagojevich and won for Rights of Conscience

I'm looking forward to hearing Luke Vander Bleek, the pharmacist who took on Gov. Rod Blagojevich and won for Rights of Conscience, on December 1st out at Pillar in the Valley. Not only is it for a good cause, but it's a story worth hearing and knowing about.

Join
Ed Martin
Candidate for US Congress, 2nd District
for a
“No Truce on Life”
Pro Life Dinner
Thursday, December 1st
Keynote Speaker: Luke Vander Bleek, Pharmacist who took on Gov. Rod Blagojevich and won for
Rights of Conscience
The Pillar in the Valley
229 Chesterfield Business pkwy
Chesterfield, MO
Doors open at 6:30 pm, Dinner at 7:00 pm
$30 per person, $50 per couple

Monday, October 10, 2011

Wealth isn't Created by Government; It's Created by YOU

I remember as a kid talking to my brother about how the government should print money to pay for everything and get rid of the national debt. It's funny how some adults still think like children: wealth is just paper.

Wealth isn't paper: it's stuff people value enough to give up free time to work for. Even more, people that create wealth don't do it simply by wanting it, but by actualizing it--without nagging (or government subsidies).

Gary North writes in one of his weekly tips on "How You Can Earn a Bachelor's Degree from an Accredited College in 3 Years for Under $15,000":
I encourage you in your efforts to improve your skills. But the power of the Day Timer and the Palm Pilot to increase Americans' productivity tells us that it is not our skill sets that are our personal key to success; it is our ability to meet deadlines without letting things fall through the cracks.
This is why a college education really does pay off. College removes external nagging, which still exists in high school. College leaves the student on his own. If he survives this last test -- deadlines without nagging -- he is ready for adulthood.
Businesses hire college graduates, not because of their skill sets, but because of their ability to survive an inefficient bureaucratic system that imparts little formal knowledge that is as important as the ability to meet deadlines without being nagged. College is the first nagging-free environment for about one-third of Americans. Half of them don't graduate.
You can sign up for Gary North's tip of the week at http://garynorth.com/.

Thursday, October 06, 2011

Steve Jobs, an entrepreneur who experienced winning and losing

NPR featured a great short piece on Steve Jobs's life, and one thing that strikes me: we live in a world full of businesses who "need" subsidizing, but he didn't.

The greatest enemy of the entrepreneur is government intervention.
Perry E. Gresham
Liberty and the Entrepreneur 
We keep hearing that businesses are "too big to fail" and about companies who "need" subsidies so they can "scale" production to "break in" to the market.

What if the companies that are "too big" are just sucking up capital that could be reinvested?

The entrepreneur, moreover, must be able to face failure and be resourceful enough to learn from it. Some of the most successful companies in America are the result of early entrepreneurial failures. The imaginative and creative business person learns by failure, as well as by success.
Perry E. Gresham
Liberty and the Entrepreneur

Friday, September 09, 2011

The best way to change government...


...is to change the people in government! 

(And keep the few willing to fight against status quo...)

I'm passing along a notice about a Missouri Precinct Project (MOPP) training session in Jeff City on Oct. 1, which focuses on teaching YOU how to meet your neighbors to find like-mind voters to influence, and ultimately, change (hold accountable) who is in Washington (and in all the other little offices too.)

MOPP is hosting a training session in Jefferson City on Saturday, Oct 1.,  and I encourage you to attend. We cannot rely on the Party system to pick and elect our candidates any longer. Change requires YOUR action. I'll be there and I hope you can make it too. 

Volunteers and friends of MOPP:

You probably have heard or seen the announcements by American Majority, a national non-profit, non-partisan political training institute and that they are starting national training seminars across the country on September 17, 2011. Well, the Missouri Precinct Project (MOPP) is one of the first organizations to have a joint training session with American Majority on Saturday, October 1, 2011 in Jefferson City.  Go to our website www.moprecinctproject.org - it also has a link to American Majority and sign up for this fabulous training online as soon as possible.

American Majority is a national organization that has developed state of the art training tools that our volunteers can use and they will benefit from the expertise that American Majority has developed. It would be well worth your time to come to this training and learn the latest strategies of how to take back our country one neighborhood at a time. I would love to see you there.

I know - there is a debate scheduled for that date between Ann Wagner and Ed Martin. They are both running for Congress from the 2nd Congressional District. But they'll have more debates. I know, because I already scheduled their debate for Bonhomme Township in December. So you won't have to miss our favorite candidate for this important office.

Hope to see you in Jefferson City on Saturday, October 1, 2011 and really find out how to walk your neighborhood.

Frieda Keough
Missouri Precinct Project (MOPP)
"Let's MOPP 'em up in '12"
for more information call:
Now...Join us on Facebook and FreedomConnector


PS....to my friends who are elected officials, I hope you do not take offense to my suggestion that you should be removed from office. The point is not that everyoneshould be removed, but that the people in government are who shape its actions.

Thursday, July 07, 2011

Video of "Protest" for Status Quo Outside of Sen. Blunt's Office

There were pre-printed (and a few hand written) signs and people, but not much energy. A couple of times the crowd started yelling "no cuts," but not full participation. Really, a call for "no cuts," is a call for status quo.

Someone handed me a little sheet that said "People Before Profits" and then listed opposition to "across the board cuts." My frustration with suggesting that there should be "no cuts" is focused on why I--or anyone else under 40--should pay into a broken system. At this point, we're not talking about providing a "safety net," we're talking about a national debt crisis.

By 2020, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid will CONSUME the entire federal budget. Period.

The cuts will come. It's just a matter of on what terms. Period.

Money does not grow on trees--no matter how loud you protest.




Also check out footage at sharpelbowsstl.blogspot.com: http://sharpelbowsstl.blogspot.com/2011/07/leftists-rally-for-higher-debt-higher.html

Tuesday, July 05, 2011

Link for Bills Signed or Veto by Gov. Nixon this Year

http://www.senate.mo.gov/11info/BTS_Web/GovActionTAT.aspx?SessionType=R

Thursday, June 09, 2011

Tonight: Phyllis Schlafly Explains “How Feminism Causes Big Government”


You can hear Phyllis Schlafly, one of the founders of The Discussion Club, explain “How Feminism Causes Big Government” at this Thursday night's Discussion Club meeting at 7:00 p.m.

Attending the Discussion Club is easy. You do not have to be a member to attend.
Just call 314-416-7722 to let us know you are coming. The meeting costs non-members $37.00 and includes dinner at 7:00 p.m. You can also attend the meeting only at 8:00 p.m. at a cost of $5.00. Reservations are required at least 48 hours in advance if coming to the dinner. Reservations are not required if coming to the meeting onlyThe meetings are held at the Hilton Frontenac.

The Hilton Frontenac is at the corner of HWY 40 and Lindbergh.

BIO:

Phyllis Schlafly was named one of the 100 most important women of the 20th century by the Ladies' Home Journal. She has been a national leader of the conservative movement since the publication of her best-selling 1964 book, A Choice Not An Echo, and a leader of the pro-family movement since 1972, when she started her national volunteer organization now called Eagle Forum. In a ten-year battle, Mrs. Schlafly led the pro-family movement to victory over the principal legislative goal of the radical feminists, called the Equal Rights Amendment, and she is America's most articulate and successful opponent of the radical feminist movement.

Mrs. Schlafly's monthly newsletter call The Phyllis Schlafly Report is now in its 44th year. Her syndicated column appears in 100 newspapers, her radio commentaries are heard daily on 500 stations, and her radio talk show on education "Phyllis Schlafly Live" is heard on 70 stations.

Mrs. Schlafly is the author or editor of 20 books on various topics and her latest book is The Flipside of Feminism. She has served as a member of the Commission on the Bicentennial of the U.S. Constitution, appointed by President Reagan and has testified before more than 50 Congressional and State Legislative committees on constitutional, national defense, and family issues.

Mrs. Schlafly received her J.D. from Washington University Law School and her Master's in Political Science from Harvard University. In 2008 she was awarded an honorary degree: Doctor of Humane Letters from Washington University.

Title: “How Feminism Causes Big Government”


Wednesday, May 04, 2011

MO Supreme Court to Hear Important Free Speech Case Next Week

An important case regarding Free Speech will be heard in Jefferson City at 9:30am next Tuesday regarding the Missouri government making useful, truthful and harmless information communicated by Kansas City Premier Apartments a criminal offense.

Dave Roland, Director of Litigation for Freedom Center of Missouri will argue the case for every Missourians right to free speech. He describes the case like this:
The Missouri Real Estate Commission has admitted that Kansas City Premier Apartments provides the public with useful, truthful, and harmless information about rental properties, but in spite of this it insists that the government is within its rights to make the communication of this information a criminal offense unless you are part of a governmentally-approved group.  The commission has also specifically argued that the Missouri Constitution's unique protections for free speech no longer have any independent meaning and cannot provide protections above and beyond those provided by the First Amendment.  We hope to persuade the Court that the Missouri Constitution means what it says when it guarantees "that every person shall be free to say, write or publish, or otherwise communicate whatever he will on any subject, being responsible for all abuses of that liberty."  
If anyone is interested in attending the argument or in showing up for a pre-argument rally in support of KCPA, please contact Dave Roland: dave [at] mofreedom.org

Please post on your Facebook and retweet to build up support for our right to free speech!

Like Freedom Center of Missouri on Facebook

CORRECTION: the hearing is on Tuesday, May 10